Reflection: Science for All?

As you teach, you will discover that every child is unique because they have a wide range of abilities (and personalities). In fact, you may have already discovered this in M201 or other teaching experiences. You’ve read quite a few articles on science teaching in the last few weeks, including “Yes Daughter . . .” and “Teaching ESL Learners.” For this reflection, I want you to think about the issue of planning and teaching science lessons to all kinds of children. Reflect upon what you’ve read, and upon your personal experiences, as you respond. First decide whether or not science should be taught differently to different learners (females, and ESL or LD students), then respond to either set of questions:

  • What are your reasons for believing that science should be taught differently? How would you change your science lessons to meet the needs of different learners—either your current M201 students or your future students—so that everyone will be successful?
  • What are your reasons for believing that science should NOT be taught differently? How would you teach science so that the students in your classroom—either your current M201 students or your future students—will be successful learners?

Getting Ready for the Midterm Exam. Would you like me to “grade” your reflection as if it were a response on the midterm exam? If you’re interested in this option, your reflection must be word-processed. I’ll use a grading rubric (see sample below) and provide specific feedback and “points” as if it were the real thing. I’ll be looking at how you’ve synthesized what you’ve read, and at the evidence you use to support your assertions. My comments on this assignment will help you know how I will grade your midterm responses. If you wish to write a “long” response—one that takes more than 10 minutes—you are welcome, but not required, to do so. If you are confused by or uncertain about my feedback, make an appointment to see me ASAP. Your midterm grade may depend on it.

 


Science for All? Evaluation Criteria

_____ point-of-view identifiable (1 pt.)
_____ clearly written, makes sense (1-2 pts)
_____ sufficient details (1-2 pts)
_____ evidence of synthesis (1-2 pts.)
_____ credible, concrete support of assertions (1-2 pts)
_____ good grammar/spelling (1pt)

Total ______/10 pts.

 


Return to Top of Page

Components   ||  Introduction   ||  Precis   ||  Assignments  ||  Student Work   ||  Lesson Plan  ||  Summation  || E328 Home Page

Created by Judith Longfield, December 2001
Last updated: October 4, 2002
URL: http://mypage.iu.edu/~jlongfie/portfolio/sci_all_reflect.html
Comments: jlongfie@indiana.edu