Home
Acknowledgments
Introduction
Program & Students
Goals and Objectives
  Overarching Goal
  Objectives
Course Material
  Content
  Assignments
    Written
    Oral
Innovations
Reflections
  Written Assignments
Revisions for Sp. 2002
  Oral Assignments
Student Evaluations
  Multi-Op Evaluations
  Extra Evaluations
Appendices
STUDENT EVALUATIONS

Bureau of Evaluative Studies and Testing (BEST) Multi-Op Course and Instructor Evaluations

Perhaps the most important statement on the BEST teaching evaluations is selection 107, “I learned a lot in this course.”  This statement asks students to reflect on their own learning and moves beyond general and often unhelpful statements about the course or the instructor.  Hence, I was delighted to see that 17 out of 18 students reported that they agreed or strongly agreed with that statement.  Getting students to learn a lot was my paramount goal in creating and teaching L216 and I am pleased with the results.

Numerically, I scored highest in enthusiasm (3.88 on a scale of 0-4), knowledge of the subject (3.33) and being prepared for class (3.28).  I have learned over the years, that these aspects of my teaching are consistently strong.

Weaker results relate predictably to the newness and experimental nature of the course and the consequent lack of specificity in expectations for the various assignments.  Students indicated the weak aspects by responding less enthusiastically about knowing what was expected of them (2.44), the grading procedure (2.50), the fairness in grading (2.78), and the clarity of explanations (2.83).  I believe the changes and adaptations to course assignments address the weaknesses these lower scores reveal.