Conclusion
Reflections
about the three main assignment clusters (Writer’s Journals, Analytical
Synthesis Papers, and the Collaborative Group Project) as well as discussion
about what I have learned from the findings of the classroom research project
can be found in those sections of the portfolio where the topics are
discussed. Hence, I do not wish to
rehearse them here. Instead, I would
like to reflect briefly, by way of conclusion, on the lessons I have learned by
conducting formal classroom research and writing this course portfolio.
Perhaps the
most important lesson for me has been the confirmation of student learning in
areas that matter to me most (key writing skills and intellectual growth
vis-à-vis the course topic). As I have
taught the course and revised it over the years, I always sensed that students
were indeed learning what I wanted them to learn, but without objective
assessment, I could never be sure. The
classroom research and the analysis of its data have reassured me that students
are, in fact, improving their writing skills and learning to think in a more
sophisticated fashion with respect to our consumerist/capitalist economic
system. This reassurance is important to
me emotionally as a teacher, whose work is guided by a deep commitment to student
learning. It is also important for me to
be able to demonstrate in objective terms to others that students have learned
something of substance on my watch.
The
classroom research project has also forced me to recognize and accept the skill
level of the average LAMP sophomore entering L216. When I taught the course for the first time,
I naively thought (and even told students) that I would not have to teach
writing skills at all; I thought – erroneously – that all my time could be
spent on the fun stuff: connecting ideas,
interpreting texts, and critiquing the American economic system. The classroom research project taught me
beyond a shadow of a doubt that these first assumptions were faulty. As I structured the project, wrote the
rubrics, read and re-read students’ work, and finally wrote about their work, I
came to realize that students need much more help and practice with basic
writing skills than I had anticipated.
Although entering L216 students can all write competently at the
sentence level, they need active instruction and guided practice in putting
solid paragraphs together and organizing a coherent essay. In other words, classroom research and reflection
about it have helped me to realize that I must back up and meet students where
they are with respect to their writing skills.
I can no longer justifiably operate from an assumption that LAMP
students – because they are high achievers and work hard -- do not need help
with core writing skills.
I believe
that more time spent on basic writing skills will in the end help students to
make greater advances in the key components of college writing such as
fashioning strong theses and using evidence effectively. At the same time, I think more instruction
and practice with writing basics will allow students to express their thoughts
more clearly, more persuasively, and more coherently. Thence, students will be able to demonstrate
their intellectual growth even more conclusively that they did in this study.